福井/査読結果/BotSE2019
をテンプレートにして作成
[
トップ
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
開始行:
[[福井/査読結果]]
*査読結果 [#t9942130]
**REVIEW 1 [#pb040f03]
Summary:~
Expert finding for question answering is an important and...
Is the tag-based method a good choice? ~
The main expert finding approaches can be categorized int...
Lack of discussion or comparison on state-of-the-art stud...
This paper only considers one baseline, which is publishe...
The result is not substantial.~
The performance in terms of nDCG is 0.833 (baseline is 0....
[1] H. Zhu, H. Cao, H. Xiong, E. Chen, and J. Tian, “Towa...
[2] H. Zhu, E. Chen, H. Xiong, H. Cao, and J. Tian, “Rank...
[3] Tian Y, Kochhar P S, Lim E P, et al. Predicting best ...
[4] Wang J, Sun J, Lin H, et al. Convolutional neural net...
[5] Zhao Z, Zhang L, He X, et al. Expert finding for ques...
[6] Wang X, Huang C, Yao L, et al. A survey on expert rec...
[7] Tondulkar R, Dubey M, Desarkar M S. Get me the best: ...
**REVIEW2 [#c693713c]
This paper describes an improved approach for expert reco...
on PMF (Probabilistic Matrix Factorization) and term expa...
-Strengths of the paper:
--The authors provide a description of existing approache...
-Major issues:
--As far as I can tell, the paper is not really about bot...
--To emphasize the previous point, even the experiment in...
--I honestly don't think this paper would this workshop (...
-Minor issues:
--There are phrasing issues in the paper. Some weird sent...
-- I think in a short paper like this, there is no need f...
--"In the study, PMF..." - in which study?
--References should not be used as a structural part of a...
--In the results, the authors show that based on nDGC sco...
--There could be additional related work discussed (on th...
**REVIEW3 [#n70cc469]
This paper presents a method for expert finding in a comm...
The paper itself is interesting and easy to follow - alth...
The main concerns i have about this paper are:~
-first of all, it does not present a bot as such - i.e., ...
-expert finding is also a task that seems to me more than...
終了行:
[[福井/査読結果]]
*査読結果 [#t9942130]
**REVIEW 1 [#pb040f03]
Summary:~
Expert finding for question answering is an important and...
Is the tag-based method a good choice? ~
The main expert finding approaches can be categorized int...
Lack of discussion or comparison on state-of-the-art stud...
This paper only considers one baseline, which is publishe...
The result is not substantial.~
The performance in terms of nDCG is 0.833 (baseline is 0....
[1] H. Zhu, H. Cao, H. Xiong, E. Chen, and J. Tian, “Towa...
[2] H. Zhu, E. Chen, H. Xiong, H. Cao, and J. Tian, “Rank...
[3] Tian Y, Kochhar P S, Lim E P, et al. Predicting best ...
[4] Wang J, Sun J, Lin H, et al. Convolutional neural net...
[5] Zhao Z, Zhang L, He X, et al. Expert finding for ques...
[6] Wang X, Huang C, Yao L, et al. A survey on expert rec...
[7] Tondulkar R, Dubey M, Desarkar M S. Get me the best: ...
**REVIEW2 [#c693713c]
This paper describes an improved approach for expert reco...
on PMF (Probabilistic Matrix Factorization) and term expa...
-Strengths of the paper:
--The authors provide a description of existing approache...
-Major issues:
--As far as I can tell, the paper is not really about bot...
--To emphasize the previous point, even the experiment in...
--I honestly don't think this paper would this workshop (...
-Minor issues:
--There are phrasing issues in the paper. Some weird sent...
-- I think in a short paper like this, there is no need f...
--"In the study, PMF..." - in which study?
--References should not be used as a structural part of a...
--In the results, the authors show that based on nDGC sco...
--There could be additional related work discussed (on th...
**REVIEW3 [#n70cc469]
This paper presents a method for expert finding in a comm...
The paper itself is interesting and easy to follow - alth...
The main concerns i have about this paper are:~
-first of all, it does not present a bot as such - i.e., ...
-expert finding is also a task that seems to me more than...
ページ名:
![[PukiWiki]](image/wadanyan.png "[PukiWiki]")
