大平/査読結果/ICSME2014
をテンプレートにして作成
[
トップ
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
開始行:
[[大平/査読結果]]
*ICSME2014 Reviews [#ne2122c1]
Dear Masao,
We regret to inform you that we are unable to include you...
of ICSME 2014. In total, we received 267 abstracts and 21...
papers were accepted, yielding an acceptance rate of 19%.
All papers went through a rigorous reviewing process in w...
reviews, followed by discussions among the assigned revie...
entire program committee. The program committee selected ...
without targeting any quota or acceptance rate: merits an...
independently of other papers taken into consideration.
Attached to this email, you will find the reviews of your...
the revision of your paper for other ICSME tracks or othe...
consider submitting your work to some of the other tracks...
Achievement (ERA) Track, the Industry Track, the Tool Dem...
especially if the reviewers suggest you to do so. Note th...
these tracks is June 23 (AoE), the deadline for full subm...
July 7). More information on these can be found at http:/...
You may also consider submitting your work to one of the ...
More information on those can be found at http://www.icsm...
We sincerely hope that you will attend ICSME 2014 in Vict...
September 28 - October 3, 2014.
Thank you for submitting your paper to ICSME 2014
Best regards,
Leon Moonen and Lori Pollock
ICSME 2014 Program Co-Chairs
**----------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------- ...
This paper proposes task assignment optimization for OSS ...
SVM machine learning method, the authors propose an assig...
each developer. The proposed algorithm and traditional SV...
two projects, Firefox and Eclipse, and the proposed appro...
balanced assignment and total bug fix time.
＋ Overall, i enjoyed reading this paper. The paper propo...
for the OSS projects, where small set of developers tends...
sets the limitation of the total task load, and the solut...
it shows the reduction of the total bug-fix time with thi...
＋ An empirical validation has been performed with two la...
the results clearly show the advantages of the proposed a...
以下マイナスポイント
- It's not clear if the proposed approach would work inte...
the system gets the bug-fix allocation history and the ne...
allocation for that new bug. Or It would compute the opti...
of the target systems at the same time. In the latter cas...
Authors should clearly describe the proposed approach in ...
to understand it.
- Explanation of the model and formula is not sufficient....
only limited overview of the model, so simple example of ...
more in depth.
- In the experiment, the authors have used a previous app...
the previous approach would be constructed with sufficien...
I would guess that the older approach had different persp...
assignment. Authors should clearly present this issue.
- Explanation of Fig.1 does not fit to the elements of Fi...
needed for Fig.1.
- Meaning of "common" is not clear.
- For Table VI, we would guess that the difference of SVM...
Is the difference significant? I'm not sure we would do s...
would mention on this issue.
- It seems that the approach assumes each bug is independ...
- What is the actual "objective functions?" It is clearly...
- As time goes by, time limitation L might be changed (an...
- As the authors described in Section 7, it would be inte...
---------------------------------------------------------...
#comment()
**----------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------- ...
Summary:
In this paper, the authors formulate bug triaging as inte...
Comment:
Overall, the authors propose a novel approach for an impo...
1. I wonder why the optimal bug triaging needs to be form...
2. Why the goal of bug triaging is to maximize the total ...
3. The proposed formulation does not take into account th...
4. The computation of fixing time of a developer on a bug...
5. Predicting fixing time of a developer for a bug (C_ij)...
6. The experiment setting has some flaws. For example, bu...
---------------------------------------------------------...
#comment()
**----------------------- REVIEW 3 --------------------- ...
This paper proposed a new capacity-aware bug triaging tec...
This paper is well-structured and the formulation to a 0-...
To improve the paper, please consider the following points:
Since 0-1 IP problems are NP-hard, the scalability of the...
An example of Preference Pij and the intent of Exp.5 is n...
MINOR ISSUES:
- Figure 6, 7 and 8 are too small to read.
- Figure 2, 4, and 5 have no Y-axis labels.
- The explanation of "common" at Sec.IV-A is hard to unde...
- The calculation of Cij is ambiguous and needs a more co...
- In p.3, "our our" -> "our"
- At the 4th paragraph in Sec.IV-B, the reason should be ...
- In Table VI, "the less period" -> "the less busy period"
- The first paragraph in Sec.III-B 6) is unclear. L is no...
- At the 1st paragraph in Sec.V-A, "a tool large" -> "a t...
- At the 1st paragraph in Sec.V-B, "is is" -> "is"
-----------------------
#comment()
終了行:
[[大平/査読結果]]
*ICSME2014 Reviews [#ne2122c1]
Dear Masao,
We regret to inform you that we are unable to include you...
of ICSME 2014. In total, we received 267 abstracts and 21...
papers were accepted, yielding an acceptance rate of 19%.
All papers went through a rigorous reviewing process in w...
reviews, followed by discussions among the assigned revie...
entire program committee. The program committee selected ...
without targeting any quota or acceptance rate: merits an...
independently of other papers taken into consideration.
Attached to this email, you will find the reviews of your...
the revision of your paper for other ICSME tracks or othe...
consider submitting your work to some of the other tracks...
Achievement (ERA) Track, the Industry Track, the Tool Dem...
especially if the reviewers suggest you to do so. Note th...
these tracks is June 23 (AoE), the deadline for full subm...
July 7). More information on these can be found at http:/...
You may also consider submitting your work to one of the ...
More information on those can be found at http://www.icsm...
We sincerely hope that you will attend ICSME 2014 in Vict...
September 28 - October 3, 2014.
Thank you for submitting your paper to ICSME 2014
Best regards,
Leon Moonen and Lori Pollock
ICSME 2014 Program Co-Chairs
**----------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------- ...
This paper proposes task assignment optimization for OSS ...
SVM machine learning method, the authors propose an assig...
each developer. The proposed algorithm and traditional SV...
two projects, Firefox and Eclipse, and the proposed appro...
balanced assignment and total bug fix time.
＋ Overall, i enjoyed reading this paper. The paper propo...
for the OSS projects, where small set of developers tends...
sets the limitation of the total task load, and the solut...
it shows the reduction of the total bug-fix time with thi...
＋ An empirical validation has been performed with two la...
the results clearly show the advantages of the proposed a...
以下マイナスポイント
- It's not clear if the proposed approach would work inte...
the system gets the bug-fix allocation history and the ne...
allocation for that new bug. Or It would compute the opti...
of the target systems at the same time. In the latter cas...
Authors should clearly describe the proposed approach in ...
to understand it.
- Explanation of the model and formula is not sufficient....
only limited overview of the model, so simple example of ...
more in depth.
- In the experiment, the authors have used a previous app...
the previous approach would be constructed with sufficien...
I would guess that the older approach had different persp...
assignment. Authors should clearly present this issue.
- Explanation of Fig.1 does not fit to the elements of Fi...
needed for Fig.1.
- Meaning of "common" is not clear.
- For Table VI, we would guess that the difference of SVM...
Is the difference significant? I'm not sure we would do s...
would mention on this issue.
- It seems that the approach assumes each bug is independ...
- What is the actual "objective functions?" It is clearly...
- As time goes by, time limitation L might be changed (an...
- As the authors described in Section 7, it would be inte...
---------------------------------------------------------...
#comment()
**----------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------- ...
Summary:
In this paper, the authors formulate bug triaging as inte...
Comment:
Overall, the authors propose a novel approach for an impo...
1. I wonder why the optimal bug triaging needs to be form...
2. Why the goal of bug triaging is to maximize the total ...
3. The proposed formulation does not take into account th...
4. The computation of fixing time of a developer on a bug...
5. Predicting fixing time of a developer for a bug (C_ij)...
6. The experiment setting has some flaws. For example, bu...
---------------------------------------------------------...
#comment()
**----------------------- REVIEW 3 --------------------- ...
This paper proposed a new capacity-aware bug triaging tec...
This paper is well-structured and the formulation to a 0-...
To improve the paper, please consider the following points:
Since 0-1 IP problems are NP-hard, the scalability of the...
An example of Preference Pij and the intent of Exp.5 is n...
MINOR ISSUES:
- Figure 6, 7 and 8 are too small to read.
- Figure 2, 4, and 5 have no Y-axis labels.
- The explanation of "common" at Sec.IV-A is hard to unde...
- The calculation of Cij is ambiguous and needs a more co...
- In p.3, "our our" -> "our"
- At the 4th paragraph in Sec.IV-B, the reason should be ...
- In Table VI, "the less period" -> "the less busy period"
- The first paragraph in Sec.III-B 6) is unclear. L is no...
- At the 1st paragraph in Sec.V-A, "a tool large" -> "a t...
- At the 1st paragraph in Sec.V-B, "is is" -> "is"
-----------------------
#comment()
ページ名:
![[PukiWiki]](image/wadanyan.png "[PukiWiki]")
