伊原/KCSD2009
をテンプレートにして作成
[
トップ
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
開始行:
[[伊原]]
**The 3rd International Workshop on Knowledge Collaborati...
KCSD 2009~
URL:http://se.naist.jp/kcsd2009/
:title| Differences of Time between Modification and Re-m...
:paper|&attachref(KCSD2009_v6.pdf);~
&attachref(KCSD2009_v6.tex);~
:presentation|pptx：&attachref();~
ppt：&attachref();~
*** Reviews [#c0d97db9]
### Review 1 ###
EVALUATION (points in favour and against, and comments fo...
This paper presents an analysis of the amount of time req...
that was opened for the first time compared to a bug that...
paper finds that bugs that are reopened are more quickly ...
are opened for the first time.
While this result may not be terribly surprising, it is n...
empirical data supporting the finding. The paper has two ...
1) The paper is difficult to read and contradicts itself ...
reasons) several times.
For instance:
a) The abstract says: "time to resolve a firstly reported...
b) The intro says: "time required for re-modifying a bug ...
c) 5.2 says: "time to modify firstly-modified bugs [ノ] i...
d) Table 1 indicates that the time to modify a new bug is...
While items a and c are consistent (as are b and d), they...
one another. This could be resolved by changing the langu...
time required to close a new bug was found to be longer t...
had been reopened. Using 'new bug' and 'reopened bug' wou...
than 'modifications' or 'firstly reported bug' and 're-mo...
The paper would benefit immensely from being edited by a ...
as several tense changes and incomplete sentences impede ...
core concepts of the paper.
2) The results require much greater discussion. For insta...
the results are statistically significant, and while I be...
think the table (or analysis) is necessary. From Table 1 ...
there is a large difference. More interesting than a stat...
time difference would be a real discussion about why this...
matters, how it can be increased or decreased, or how pro...
information to adapt their development practices.
Certainly we can imagine several qualitative reasons why ...
this way, just as we could hypothesize their foil. A desc...
the analyzed data, could add important data in support of...
example, I would expect new bugs to take longer to close ...
to languish initially while developers understood the pro...
the paper), or simply because the developer never got to ...
period of time. I could also imagine a new bug being addr...
because a discussion needs to happen about whether the bu...
is a dupe, and if it should be fixed. These support the f...
At the same time, I could imagine that a bug could take l...
subsequent times because it was clearly a difficult probl...
be reopened: in these cases the bug would need to be cons...
greater length, or the bug was reopened because once it w...
greater harm to the system. While these ideas are all sim...
authors have the data to give a sense of _why_ new bugs t...
than reopened bugs. I STRONGLY believe that this 'why' is...
than the simple fact that reopened bugs are closed more q...
'why' the findings of the paper are not actionable to pro...
from this finding and improve their own development pract...
Other points:
- The related work section is very brief and should more ...
the relationship of this work to the 5 cited pieces of wo...
- The related work mentions 2 case studies (apache and mo...
never mentioned again. A second case study would greatly ...
validity of this study.
- There is no discussion of the experimental validity or ...
the case study.
- Extraneous information is included several times in the...
of bug tracking systems, or the description of why Firefo...
serve only to fill space and to detract from the primary ...
- Fig 1: what is tossed? Do you mean reassigned?
- In the paper the title is mentioned several times (e.g....
paper, ノ, or the conclusion: In this paper, ノ. In both ...
additional information, in addition to being a sentence f...
- The page headers (pg. 2+) are incorrect.
- Section 5 should better describe why these bugs were se...
assume there have been more than 10,917 bugs closed for f...
v3.
### Review 2 ###
EVALUATION (points in favor and against, and comments for...
The paper compared the time difference between first-time...
and re-opened bugs in the mozilla firefox project. re-ope...
to take shorter time.
The Discussions section made the wrong claim. The data an...
that re-opened bugs take shorter time, but the Dicussions...
(p.4)
"As a result of this study, we observed that time to modi...
bugs was shorter than time to re-modify a bug in spite of...
developers."
It then continues to claim that
"In this paper, we did not analyze time to resolve bugs, ...
developer’s skills and priority and/or severity of bugs."
Well, I think the whole paper is about the time to resolv...
are those times?
Please clarify those points.
---------------END---------------------------------------...
終了行:
[[伊原]]
**The 3rd International Workshop on Knowledge Collaborati...
KCSD 2009~
URL:http://se.naist.jp/kcsd2009/
:title| Differences of Time between Modification and Re-m...
:paper|&attachref(KCSD2009_v6.pdf);~
&attachref(KCSD2009_v6.tex);~
:presentation|pptx：&attachref();~
ppt：&attachref();~
*** Reviews [#c0d97db9]
### Review 1 ###
EVALUATION (points in favour and against, and comments fo...
This paper presents an analysis of the amount of time req...
that was opened for the first time compared to a bug that...
paper finds that bugs that are reopened are more quickly ...
are opened for the first time.
While this result may not be terribly surprising, it is n...
empirical data supporting the finding. The paper has two ...
1) The paper is difficult to read and contradicts itself ...
reasons) several times.
For instance:
a) The abstract says: "time to resolve a firstly reported...
b) The intro says: "time required for re-modifying a bug ...
c) 5.2 says: "time to modify firstly-modified bugs [ノ] i...
d) Table 1 indicates that the time to modify a new bug is...
While items a and c are consistent (as are b and d), they...
one another. This could be resolved by changing the langu...
time required to close a new bug was found to be longer t...
had been reopened. Using 'new bug' and 'reopened bug' wou...
than 'modifications' or 'firstly reported bug' and 're-mo...
The paper would benefit immensely from being edited by a ...
as several tense changes and incomplete sentences impede ...
core concepts of the paper.
2) The results require much greater discussion. For insta...
the results are statistically significant, and while I be...
think the table (or analysis) is necessary. From Table 1 ...
there is a large difference. More interesting than a stat...
time difference would be a real discussion about why this...
matters, how it can be increased or decreased, or how pro...
information to adapt their development practices.
Certainly we can imagine several qualitative reasons why ...
this way, just as we could hypothesize their foil. A desc...
the analyzed data, could add important data in support of...
example, I would expect new bugs to take longer to close ...
to languish initially while developers understood the pro...
the paper), or simply because the developer never got to ...
period of time. I could also imagine a new bug being addr...
because a discussion needs to happen about whether the bu...
is a dupe, and if it should be fixed. These support the f...
At the same time, I could imagine that a bug could take l...
subsequent times because it was clearly a difficult probl...
be reopened: in these cases the bug would need to be cons...
greater length, or the bug was reopened because once it w...
greater harm to the system. While these ideas are all sim...
authors have the data to give a sense of _why_ new bugs t...
than reopened bugs. I STRONGLY believe that this 'why' is...
than the simple fact that reopened bugs are closed more q...
'why' the findings of the paper are not actionable to pro...
from this finding and improve their own development pract...
Other points:
- The related work section is very brief and should more ...
the relationship of this work to the 5 cited pieces of wo...
- The related work mentions 2 case studies (apache and mo...
never mentioned again. A second case study would greatly ...
validity of this study.
- There is no discussion of the experimental validity or ...
the case study.
- Extraneous information is included several times in the...
of bug tracking systems, or the description of why Firefo...
serve only to fill space and to detract from the primary ...
- Fig 1: what is tossed? Do you mean reassigned?
- In the paper the title is mentioned several times (e.g....
paper, ノ, or the conclusion: In this paper, ノ. In both ...
additional information, in addition to being a sentence f...
- The page headers (pg. 2+) are incorrect.
- Section 5 should better describe why these bugs were se...
assume there have been more than 10,917 bugs closed for f...
v3.
### Review 2 ###
EVALUATION (points in favor and against, and comments for...
The paper compared the time difference between first-time...
and re-opened bugs in the mozilla firefox project. re-ope...
to take shorter time.
The Discussions section made the wrong claim. The data an...
that re-opened bugs take shorter time, but the Dicussions...
(p.4)
"As a result of this study, we observed that time to modi...
bugs was shorter than time to re-modify a bug in spite of...
developers."
It then continues to claim that
"In this paper, we did not analyze time to resolve bugs, ...
developer’s skills and priority and/or severity of bugs."
Well, I think the whole paper is about the time to resolv...
are those times?
Please clarify those points.
---------------END---------------------------------------...
ページ名:
![[PukiWiki]](image/wadanyan.png "[PukiWiki]")
