CollabTech2009_Reviewed の編集

[[みずきたん]]~
｜＿[[CollabTech2009 & OSS2009>mizuki_OSS2008]]~
　　｜＿''査読結果 CollabTech2009''~
　　｜＿[[査読結果 OSS2009>oss2009_reviewed]]~

**査読結果 [#r2199c6f]
&color(red){''ポスター採用''};~
投稿版ポスターPDF　&attachref(Mizuki_Yamamoto_CollabTech2009_Poster.pdf);~
投稿版ポスターword　&attachref(CollabTech2009 camera_ready_ver1.0.1.docx);

***査読結果を踏まえて今後 [#rc70bc59]
-社会的要因まで考えると広すぎるが、なぜオープネスが変化したかの背景をプロジェクト背景を通して言うべき

-もっとプロジェクトを調べるべき
***内容まとめ [#b2c49b86]
-比較的、プロジェクト初期時の傾向は明らかであり、トータルで傾向を見たとき仮説が正しいと結論づけるのは早計である。考える要因はたくさんある。
-- 例えば
--- ITや.com産業の低迷などの影響は？
--- 貢献者の技術やタイプは？ノンコアの質は分析期間の終わりからはじめまで一貫していたか？
--- ドットコム破綻（インターネットバブル）はノンコアメンバーに影響していないのか？

- オープネスの減少がノンコアの減少に結びついているのか、ノンコアの減少がオープネスの減少に結びついてるのか不明

- そもそも何（証拠）が影響して、前半と後半で変化を生んでいるのか？という説明がないので、もっと分析を！！

-成功プロジェクトと成功してないプロジェクトを比べるべき

-全く新しくありませんが、この論文で示された考え、仕事は基本的に堅実で、興味を引く

-テクニカルなこの会議に向いてないから、社会系に出したほうが良い
***原文 [#v6834555]

&color(red){''査読者１''};

This paper presents the how the community openness influence the success of  OSS community. It examined the case of Apache HTTP server community and tried  to validate their two hypotheses. Although it seems that their hypotheses were supported according to the data provided, it is clear that this analyses are at relatively early stage of its investigation and it is far too soon to conclude that those hypotheses are  supported.  For example, the data provided do not consider downturn of .com and IT industry.  Furthermore, the analysis does not make any reference to the type or quality of contributors.  Were the quality of non-core members consistent through out this study period?  Didn't ".com crash" have any effect on the composition of types of non-core members? Moreover, it was not clear that the decrease of the number of non-core members was caused by the decrease of the acceptance or other way around.  The main reason why this question is asked is that there is no adequate explanation about what caused the changes between the first half (1997-2002) and the last half (2003-2007).  Hence, it warrants further investigation.

&color(red){''査読者2''};

The result of the paper is interesting. But the author analyzed the Apache HTTP Server Community. The OSS is one of most successful communities.
I probably think that the authors need to compare with a successful community and a non-successful community.

&color(red){''査読者3''};

The idea presented in this paper is interesting, though not brand new. And the work is basically solid.

Application issues are highly expected to be addressed.

&color(red){''査読者4''};

This paper deals with quite interesting issues but the scope of the paper is not fitting with technical conferences.

It is recommended to submit it to events or journals related to social sciences.

タイムスタンプを変更しない